- | Page
MN POST TEST QUESTIO NS WITH
CORRECT ANSWERS ( A+ GRADED
100% VERIFIED).
Question : Weeks v. US (1914)
CORRECT ANSWER : Exclusionary rule
warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment
Question : Terry v. Ohio (1968)
CORRECT ANSWER : "Stop and Frisk"
police may:
stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime
frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous
- | Page
Question : Reasonable Suspicion
CORRECT ANSWER : a suspicion based on specific
facts, training, and experience; less than probable cause
Question : Probable cause to arrest
CORRECT ANSWER : facts and circumstances that
would cause a reasonable person to believe that a crime has been committed and a particular person has committed it
Question : Probable cause to search
CORRECT ANSWER : facts and circumstances that
would cause a reasonable person to believe that a evidence/property is located in a particular place to be searched
Question : frisk
CORRECT ANSWER : an over-the-clothes pat-down or
minimal search by police to discover weapons
- | Page
Question : Chimel v. California (1969) - "Chimel Rule"
CORRECT ANSWER : arresting officers are limited to
searches within the immediate vicinity/control of the suspect being arrested; any other search requires warrant
Question : Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
CORRECT ANSWER : Extended the Exclusionary Rule
to the states
Question : Carroll v. U.S. (1925) - "Carroll Doctrine"
CORRECT ANSWER : Automobile exception
warrantless search of a car does not violate 4th Amendment, if there is PC to believe evidence a crime is present in vehicle, and exigent circumstances exist to believe vehicle could be moved before warrant is obtained
Question : Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
CORRECT ANSWER : Right to counsel
- | Page
extended right to counsel during criminal trial to the states
Question : Escobedo v. Illinois (1964)
CORRECT ANSWER : Right to counsel
criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations
Question : Miranda v. Arizona (1966) - "Miranda
Warning"
CORRECT ANSWER : law enforcement required to
give formal warning advising criminal suspects in custody of their rights, before interrogation
Question : In re Gault (1967)
CORRECT ANSWER : Due process
14th Amendment Due Process Clause applies to juveniles