LSAT Prep EXAM QUESTIONS AND

LSAT Prep EXAM QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 100% SOLVED (Newest 2025)

LOGICAL:

Laird: Pure research provides us with new technologies that

contribute to saving lives. Even more worthwhile than this, however, is its role in expanding our knowledge and providing new, unexplored ideas.

Kim: Your priorities are mistaken. Saving lives is what counts

most of all. Without pure research, medicine would not be as advanced as it is.

• Laird and Kim disagree on whether pure research

derives its significance in part from its providing new technologies

• expands the boundaries of our knowledge of medicine
• should have the saving of human lives as an important

goal

• has its most valuable achievements in medical

applications E)has any value apart from its role in providing new technologies to save lives - Correct Answers ✅Correct

Answer: D 1 / 4

LSAT Prep EXAM QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 100% SOLVED (Newest 2025)

Difficulty Level: Medium

This question asks you to identify the point on which Laird and Kim disagree with respect to pure research. Laird

identifies two contributions of pure research: its medical

applications ("technologies that contribute to saving lives") and its role in expanding knowledge and providing new ideas.Of these, Laird considers the second contribution to be more worthwhile. Kim, on the other hand, maintains that "Saving lives is what counts most of all." Since pure research saves lives through medical applications, Kim disagrees with Laird about whether pure research has its most valuable achievements in medical applications. The correct response, therefore, is (D).Response (A) is incorrect since we can determine, based on their statements, that Laird and Kim agree that pure research "derives its significance in part from its providing new technologies." Laird explicitly cites the value of pure research with respect to providing new technologies. Kim indicates agreement with (A), at least in the case of medical technologies, by asserting that "Without pure research, medicine would not be as advanced as it is." Response (B) is incorrect since we can determine, based on their statements, that Laird and Kim would likely agree that pure research "expands the boundaries of our knowledge of medicine." Laird notes that pure research provides us with new technologies that have medical applications. Kim points 2 / 4

LSAT Prep EXAM QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 100% SOLVED (Newest 2025) out that "Without pure research, medicine would not be as advanced as it is." Response (C) is incorrect. Kim indicates agreement that pure research "should have the saving of human lives as an important goal" since Kim's position is that "Saving lives is what counts most of all." Since Laird cites the saving of lives as one way in which pure research is worthwhile or valuable, Laird

LOGICAL:

Executive: We recently ran a set of advertisements in the

print version of a travel magazine and on that magazine's website. We were unable to get any direct information about consumer response to the print ads. However, we found that consumer response to the ads on the website was much more limited than is typical for website ads. We concluded that consumer response to the print ads was probably below par as well.The executive's reasoning does which one of the following?

• bases a prediction of the intensity of a phenomenon on

information about the intensity of that phenomenon's cause 3 / 4

LSAT Prep EXAM QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 100% SOLVED (Newest 2025)

• uses information about the typical frequency of events of a

general kind to draw a conclusion about the probability of a particular event of that kind

• infers a statistical generalization from claims about a large

number of specific instances

• uses a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a

conclusio - Correct Answers ✅Correct Answer: D

Difficulty Level: Easy

This question asks you to identify how the executive's reasoning proceeds. The ads discussed by the executive appeared in two places—in a magazine and on the magazine's website. Some information is available concerning the effect of the website ads on consumers, but no consumer response information is available about the print ads. The executive's remarks suggest that the ads that appeared in print and on the website were basically the same, or very similar. The executive reasoned that information about the effect of the website ads could be used as evidence for an inference about how the print ads likely performed. The executive thus used the analogy between the print ads and the website ads to infer something about the print ads. (D), therefore, is the correct response.Response (A) is incorrect. The executive's conclusion about the likely consumer response to the print ads does not

• / 4