AIC 301 Exam Questions and Answers All Correct
Question : The act of leaving a dangerous article such as a
gun or car with a person who the lender knows, or should know, is likely to use it in an unreasonably risky manner is
known as Select one: A. Negligent entrustment. B.
Contributory negligence. C. Negligent supervision. D. The dangerous instrumentality doctrine.
CORRECT ANSWER : A. Negligent entrustment.
Question : There was a large unmarked sinkhole on
Charlotte's property, a short distance from a public road. One evening, a police officer chased a mugger off the road and onto Charlotte's property. Both the officer and the mugger fell into the hole and were injured. Which one of the following best answers whether Charlotte is liable for the injuries to the
police officer and/or to the mugger? Select one: A. Charlotte
is not liable to either the officer or the mugger, because occupiers of land have no duty to correct defects abutting sidewalks or streets. B. Charlotte is liable to both the officer and the mugger, because she had a duty to avoid endangering travelers with an unguarded ditch. C. Charlotte is not liable to the officer or the mugger, because they were both trespassers
on her property. D. Charlotte is liable to the officer for the unguarded ditch, because the officer was a licensee, but she is not liable to the trespassing mugger.
CORRECT ANSWER : D. Charlotte is liable to the officer
for the unguarded ditch, because the officer was a licensee, but she is not liable to the trespassing mugger.
Question : Antonia was a life tenant who occupied a house at
33 Main Street. Emil had a remainder interest in the property and planned to occupy it after Antonia's death. Antonia obtained property insurance covering the house, through Richley Insurance Co. The house was destroyed by fire during Antonia's life estate. Richley must pay the insurance
policy proceeds to Select one: A. Emil, under the doctrine of
equitable conversion. B. Antonia, since she occupied the house at the time of the fire. C. Antonia, because life tenants can recover the entire value of the property that they insure.
- Emil, because he will ultimately own the property.
CORRECT ANSWER : C. Antonia, because life tenants can
recover the entire value of the property that they insure.
Question : Cristobal is in the process of purchasing a home
from Leah. They are in the executory period. This means that
Select one: A. Cristobal and Leah have signed the real estate
sales contract, but have not yet closed. B. Cristobal has made an offer and Leah has accepted verbally. C. Cristobal and Leah have signed the real estate sales contract and have gone to closing. D. Cristobal has made a verbal offer, which Leah is considering.
CORRECT ANSWER : A. Cristobal and Leah have signed
the real estate sales contract, but have not yet closed.
Question : Kirk contracts with Ernest for five shipments of
fresh produce at a specific price per shipment due at the time of delivery. Kirk fails to ship the third shipment. The contract
between Kirk and Ernest is Select one: A. Void. B. Unilateral.
- Divisible. D. Entire.
CORRECT ANSWER : C. Divisible. A contract is divisible
if each party's performance can be divided into two or more parts and if it appears that the parties to the contract contemplated separate compensation for each installment of the performance. Failure to perform one installment is not failure to perform the entire agreement. If the contract is divided into parts only to provide periodic payments toward
the full amount due upon contract completion, the contract is an entire contract, not a divisible one. When possible, courts prefer to interpret contracts as divisible to avoid hardships that can result from delaying payments under the contract until full performance has been completed.
Question : Fatima owns a cafe that is open to the public. Kaito
enters the cafe and orders a coffee. Kaito is a(n) Select one:
- Public invitee. B. Business invitee. C. Express licensee. D.
Trespasser.
CORRECT ANSWER : B. Business invitee.
Question : James wants to pursue a legal claim against his
neighbor, but he does not know what kind of dispute resolution procedure is the best choice for his situation. The dispute is over a relatively small amount of money, so James does not want to spend a lot in pursuit of his claim. James wants to be able to present his side of the story and his witnesses before a neutral third party. James would be pleased if he and his neighbor could reach a compromise, but, ideally, James wants to be able to walk away with a binding decision.Assuming that James' neighbor will agree to participate in whatever procedure James suggests, which one of the