How does Web 1.0 differ from Web 2.0? A. Web 1.0 uses the Internet is a platform for creating applications. B. Web 1.0 has Social media sites for blogging and photo sharing. C. Web 1.0 is Interactive with the user creating the content. D. Web 1.0 is static and does not adapt to the user.
The correct answer and explanation is:
Correct Answer: D. Web 1.0 is static and does not adapt to the user.
Web 1.0 refers to the earliest stage of the World Wide Web, roughly covering the period from the early 1990s to the early 2000s. During this time, websites were primarily static, meaning the content was fixed and rarely updated. Pages were written in basic HTML and displayed the same information to every visitor without interaction. Users were limited to viewing and reading content without the ability to comment, create, or modify any part of it.
Web 1.0 sites functioned like digital brochures or online newspapers. Businesses, organizations, and individuals used them mostly to publish information, contact details, and simple text or image content. There was little focus on user engagement or dynamic features. This version of the web was often referred to as a “read-only” web because users consumed content but did not contribute to it.
In contrast, Web 2.0 emerged in the mid-2000s and introduced significant changes in how the internet functioned. It is often called the “read-write” web. It allowed users to not only access content but also interact with it and generate their own content. Social media platforms, blogs, wikis, video-sharing sites, and collaborative tools are key examples of Web 2.0. Technologies such as JavaScript, AJAX, and content management systems enabled these dynamic features and made websites more responsive and user-centered.
Therefore, the key difference is that Web 1.0 was static and lacked interactivity, while Web 2.0 is dynamic, user-driven, and fosters collaboration and communication online. This makes option D the most accurate description of Web 1.0’s nature.