Power in relationships often comes down to who is more interested in maintaining the relationship. Someone who does not care as much has more power because he or she can hold firm on decisions without fear of loss. The purpose of this activity is to use a sociological lens to examine the dynamics of relationships based on the principle of least interest. Instructions: For this assignment, you will analyze examples of couples where you believe the principle of least interest is in effect. Find three examples from television, movies, or the news to use for your analysis. Use one to two major concepts and theories and appropriate terminology from the text to explain how the principle of least interest has repercussions for the couple’s power/conflict/communication dynamics. In a written paper, you will address each of the following: 1. Introduce your three examples. 2. Explain each concept, theory, and term applied. 3. Explain how each concept and theory applies to the principle of least interest. 4. Explain why one member of a couple might engage in this dynamic. Additional Considerations: Remember to use APA format to cite all sources used throughout your work. Submit a 3-4 page paper with your response.
The Correct Answer and Explanation is:
The Principle of Least Interest in Media Relationships
Student Name
Course Title
Institution
Date
Introduction
The principle of least interest, first introduced by sociologist Willard Waller, proposes that in any relationship, the person who is less emotionally invested has more power. This imbalance can affect decision-making, conflict resolution, and communication. This paper explores the dynamics of three on-screen couples where the principle of least interest is evident: Blair Waldorf and Chuck Bass from Gossip Girl, Bella Swan and Edward Cullen from Twilight, and Olivia Pope and Fitz Grant from Scandal. By using concepts such as social exchange theory and power-dependence theory, we can better understand the effects of emotional investment on relationship dynamics.
Concept and Theory Explanation
Social Exchange Theory focuses on relationships as transactions where individuals seek to maximize rewards and minimize costs (Homans, 1958). A person with less dependence on the relationship has less to lose and therefore holds more power.
Power-Dependence Theory, developed by Emerson (1962), emphasizes that the power one individual holds in a relationship is inversely related to their dependence on the other. When one partner is more dependent on emotional or practical needs, their partner gains greater control.
Application of Theories to Couples
Blair and Chuck (Gossip Girl): Throughout the series, Chuck repeatedly withdraws or withholds love, gaining control over Blair’s emotional responses. Blair’s high investment gives Chuck power to set the terms of the relationship.
Bella and Edward (Twilight): Edward initially resists intimacy and even leaves Bella in New Moon, showing his emotional detachment. Bella’s desperation and willingness to sacrifice her life for him increases his control over her, reflecting the principle of least interest.
Olivia and Fitz (Scandal): Fitz is more emotionally invested, constantly promising to leave his wife for Olivia. Olivia, on the other hand, keeps emotional distance and focuses on her career, maintaining greater power in their dynamic.
Why One Member Engages in This Dynamic
One partner may engage in the principle of least interest to protect themselves emotionally, to manipulate the situation in their favor, or because they are genuinely less dependent. People who perceive greater alternatives or fewer rewards in the current relationship often invest less. For example, Olivia Pope has career and political goals that outweigh her need for romantic attachment. Bella Swan, in contrast, is emotionally all-in, lacking other attachments, which puts her at a power disadvantage. The partner with less interest can afford to be more assertive, unyielding, and even emotionally unavailable, gaining leverage in decision-making and conflict.
Conclusion
Understanding the principle of least interest through the lens of social exchange theory and power-dependence theory helps explain how emotional investment shapes relationship power. In all three examples, the partner with more emotional distance holds greater influence. This dynamic has consequences for how couples communicate, handle conflict, and balance power, highlighting the importance of emotional equity in healthy relationships.
References
Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31–41.
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606.
Waller, W. (1938). The family: A dynamic interpretation. Dryden Press.
