Change the position of five words only in the sentence below in order for it to make complete sense. If customers like the goods, the product enables them to dislike what to look for in the trademark; if they know the future they will avoid goods with that trademark.
The correct answer and explanation is :
The corrected sentence is:
“If customers like the goods, the product enables them to know what to look for in the trademark; if they dislike the future, they will avoid goods with that trademark.”
Explanation:
The original sentence is confusing because the word order creates a muddled meaning. Here’s a breakdown of the changes made and why they make sense:
- “like the goods” vs. “dislike the goods”:
The original sentence says, “if customers like the goods,” which is fine. But later, “if they know the future they will avoid goods with that trademark,” is awkward and unclear. The goal is to separate customer behavior toward goods (liking or disliking) from the future aspect, which was misplaced. The revised version focuses on customers’ liking the product first, which leads to understanding the trademark. - “the product enables them to dislike” changed to “the product enables them to know”:
The phrase “the product enables them to dislike” is nonsensical in context. Why would a product enable someone to dislike something? The more logical interpretation is that the product helps customers know what to look for in a trademark. This shift provides clarity and ties the sentence to the idea of consumer awareness. - “what to look for in the trademark” stays as is:
This part is mostly clear, as it implies the consumer is learning to recognize certain qualities or identifiers in a trademark. - “if they know the future” changed to “if they dislike the future”:
This was one of the most confusing parts of the sentence. “Knowing the future” doesn’t logically lead to avoiding a product, but disliking the future (implying a negative consequence) would naturally motivate someone to avoid something that could lead to that outcome. Therefore, this phrase was adjusted to make more sense contextually. - “they will avoid goods with that trademark” remains unchanged:
This part of the sentence is reasonable, suggesting that if the customer doesn’t like the product or its future prospects, they would avoid that trademark.
In conclusion, these changes make the sentence logical and coherent by aligning the causes and effects of customer behavior more clearly. The final sentence outlines how liking or disliking a product’s future can influence consumer decisions regarding trademarks and goods.